PERLCALL(1) Perl Programmers Reference Guide PERLCALL(1)
NAME
perlcall - Perl calling conventions from C
DESCRIPTION
The purpose of this document is to show you how to call Perl subroutines directly from C, i.e., how
to write callbacks.
Apart from discussing the C interface provided by Perl for writing callbacks the document uses a
series of examples to show how the interface actually works in practice. In addition some techniques
for coding callbacks are covered.
Examples where callbacks are necessary include
* An Error Handler
You have created an XSUB interface to an application's C API.
A fairly common feature in applications is to allow you to define a C function that will be
called whenever something nasty occurs. What we would like is to be able to specify a Perl sub-routine subroutine
routine that will be called instead.
* An Event Driven Program
The classic example of where callbacks are used is when writing an event driven program like for
an X windows application. In this case you register functions to be called whenever specific
events occur, e.g., a mouse button is pressed, the cursor moves into a window or a menu item is
selected.
Although the techniques described here are applicable when embedding Perl in a C program, this is not
the primary goal of this document. There are other details that must be considered and are specific
to embedding Perl. For details on embedding Perl in C refer to perlembed.
Before you launch yourself head first into the rest of this document, it would be a good idea to have
read the following two documents - perlxs and perlguts.
THE CALL_ FUNCTIONS
Although this stuff is easier to explain using examples, you first need be aware of a few important
definitions.
Perl has a number of C functions that allow you to call Perl subroutines. They are
I32 call_sv(SV* sv, I32 flags);
I32 call_pv(char *subname, I32 flags);
I32 call_method(char *methname, I32 flags);
I32 call_argv(char *subname, I32 flags, register char **argv);
The key function is call_sv. All the other functions are fairly simple wrappers which make it easier
to call Perl subroutines in special cases. At the end of the day they will all call call_sv to invoke
the Perl subroutine.
All the call_* functions have a "flags" parameter which is used to pass a bit mask of options to
Perl. This bit mask operates identically for each of the functions. The settings available in the
bit mask are discussed in "FLAG VALUES".
Each of the functions will now be discussed in turn.
call_sv
call_sv takes two parameters, the first, "sv", is an SV*. This allows you to specify the Perl
subroutine to be called either as a C string (which has first been converted to an SV) or a ref-erence reference
erence to a subroutine. The section, Using call_sv, shows how you can make use of call_sv.
call_pv
The function, call_pv, is similar to call_sv except it expects its first parameter to be a C
char* which identifies the Perl subroutine you want to call, e.g., "call_pv("fred", 0)". If the
subroutine you want to call is in another package, just include the package name in the string,
e.g., "pkg::fred".
call_method
The function call_method is used to call a method from a Perl class. The parameter "methname"
corresponds to the name of the method to be called. Note that the class that the method belongs
to is passed on the Perl stack rather than in the parameter list. This class can be either the
name of the class (for a static method) or a reference to an object (for a virtual method). See
perlobj for more information on static and virtual methods and "Using call_method" for an exam-ple example
ple of using call_method.
call_argv
call_argv calls the Perl subroutine specified by the C string stored in the "subname" parameter.
It also takes the usual "flags" parameter. The final parameter, "argv", consists of a NULL ter-minated terminated
minated list of C strings to be passed as parameters to the Perl subroutine. See Using
call_argv.
All the functions return an integer. This is a count of the number of items returned by the Perl sub-routine. subroutine.
routine. The actual items returned by the subroutine are stored on the Perl stack.
As a general rule you should always check the return value from these functions. Even if you are
expecting only a particular number of values to be returned from the Perl subroutine, there is noth-ing nothing
ing to stop someone from doing something unexpected--don't say you haven't been warned.
FLAG VALUES
The "flags" parameter in all the call_* functions is a bit mask which can consist of any combination
of the symbols defined below, OR'ed together.
G_VOID
Calls the Perl subroutine in a void context.
This flag has 2 effects:
1. It indicates to the subroutine being called that it is executing in a void context (if it exe-cutes executes
cutes wantarray the result will be the undefined value).
2. It ensures that nothing is actually returned from the subroutine.
The value returned by the call_* function indicates how many items have been returned by the Perl
subroutine - in this case it will be 0.
G_SCALAR
Calls the Perl subroutine in a scalar context. This is the default context flag setting for all the
call_* functions.
This flag has 2 effects:
1. It indicates to the subroutine being called that it is executing in a scalar context (if it exe-cutes executes
cutes wantarray the result will be false).
2. It ensures that only a scalar is actually returned from the subroutine. The subroutine can, of
course, ignore the wantarray and return a list anyway. If so, then only the last element of the
list will be returned.
The value returned by the call_* function indicates how many items have been returned by the Perl
subroutine - in this case it will be either 0 or 1.
If 0, then you have specified the G_DISCARD flag.
If 1, then the item actually returned by the Perl subroutine will be stored on the Perl stack - the
section Returning a Scalar shows how to access this value on the stack. Remember that regardless of
how many items the Perl subroutine returns, only the last one will be accessible from the stack -think stackthink
think of the case where only one value is returned as being a list with only one element. Any other
items that were returned will not exist by the time control returns from the call_* function. The
section Returning a list in a scalar context shows an example of this behavior.
G_ARRAY
Calls the Perl subroutine in a list context.
As with G_SCALAR, this flag has 2 effects:
1. It indicates to the subroutine being called that it is executing in a list context (if it exe-cutes executes
cutes wantarray the result will be true).
2. It ensures that all items returned from the subroutine will be accessible when control returns
from the call_* function.
The value returned by the call_* function indicates how many items have been returned by the Perl
subroutine.
If 0, then you have specified the G_DISCARD flag.
If not 0, then it will be a count of the number of items returned by the subroutine. These items will
be stored on the Perl stack. The section Returning a list of values gives an example of using the
G_ARRAY flag and the mechanics of accessing the returned items from the Perl stack.
G_DISCARD
By default, the call_* functions place the items returned from by the Perl subroutine on the stack.
If you are not interested in these items, then setting this flag will make Perl get rid of them auto-matically automatically
matically for you. Note that it is still possible to indicate a context to the Perl subroutine by
using either G_SCALAR or G_ARRAY.
If you do not set this flag then it is very important that you make sure that any temporaries (i.e.,
parameters passed to the Perl subroutine and values returned from the subroutine) are disposed of
yourself. The section Returning a Scalar gives details of how to dispose of these temporaries
explicitly and the section Using Perl to dispose of temporaries discusses the specific circumstances
where you can ignore the problem and let Perl deal with it for you.
G_NOARGS
Whenever a Perl subroutine is called using one of the call_* functions, it is assumed by default that
parameters are to be passed to the subroutine. If you are not passing any parameters to the Perl
subroutine, you can save a bit of time by setting this flag. It has the effect of not creating the
@_ array for the Perl subroutine.
Although the functionality provided by this flag may seem straightforward, it should be used only if
there is a good reason to do so. The reason for being cautious is that even if you have specified
the G_NOARGS flag, it is still possible for the Perl subroutine that has been called to think that
you have passed it parameters.
In fact, what can happen is that the Perl subroutine you have called can access the @_ array from a
previous Perl subroutine. This will occur when the code that is executing the call_* function has
itself been called from another Perl subroutine. The code below illustrates this
sub fred
{ print "@_\n" }
sub joe
{ &fred }
&joe(1,2,3);
This will print
1 2 3
What has happened is that "fred" accesses the @_ array which belongs to "joe".
G_EVAL
It is possible for the Perl subroutine you are calling to terminate abnormally, e.g., by calling die
explicitly or by not actually existing. By default, when either of these events occurs, the process
will terminate immediately. If you want to trap this type of event, specify the G_EVAL flag. It
will put an eval { } around the subroutine call.
Whenever control returns from the call_* function you need to check the $@ variable as you would in a
normal Perl script.
The value returned from the call_* function is dependent on what other flags have been specified and
whether an error has occurred. Here are all the different cases that can occur:
If the call_* function returns normally, then the value returned is as specified in the previous
sections.
If G_DISCARD is specified, the return value will always be 0.
If G_ARRAY is specified and an error has occurred, the return value will always be 0.
If G_SCALAR is specified and an error has occurred, the return value will be 1 and the value on
the top of the stack will be undef. This means that if you have already detected the error by
checking $@ and you want the program to continue, you must remember to pop the undef from the
stack.
See Using G_EVAL for details on using G_EVAL.
G_KEEPERR
You may have noticed that using the G_EVAL flag described above will always clear the $@ variable and
set it to a string describing the error iff there was an error in the called code. This unqualified
resetting of $@ can be problematic in the reliable identification of errors using the "eval {}" mech-anism, mechanism,
anism, because the possibility exists that perl will call other code (end of block processing code,
for example) between the time the error causes $@ to be set within "eval {}", and the subsequent
statement which checks for the value of $@ gets executed in the user's script.
This scenario will mostly be applicable to code that is meant to be called from within destructors,
asynchronous callbacks, signal handlers, "__DIE__" or "__WARN__" hooks, and "tie" functions. In such
situations, you will not want to clear $@ at all, but simply to append any new errors to any existing
value of $@.
The G_KEEPERR flag is meant to be used in conjunction with G_EVAL in call_* functions that are used
to implement such code. This flag has no effect when G_EVAL is not used.
When G_KEEPERR is used, any errors in the called code will be prefixed with the string "\t(in
cleanup)", and appended to the current value of $@. an error will not be appended if that same error
string is already at the end of $@.
In addition, a warning is generated using the appended string. This can be disabled using "no warn-ings warnings
ings 'misc'".
The G_KEEPERR flag was introduced in Perl version 5.002.
See Using G_KEEPERR for an example of a situation that warrants the use of this flag.
Determining the Context
As mentioned above, you can determine the context of the currently executing subroutine in Perl with
wantarray. The equivalent test can be made in C by using the "GIMME_V" macro, which returns
"G_ARRAY" if you have been called in a list context, "G_SCALAR" if in a scalar context, or "G_VOID"
if in a void context (i.e. the return value will not be used). An older version of this macro is
called "GIMME"; in a void context it returns "G_SCALAR" instead of "G_VOID". An example of using the
"GIMME_V" macro is shown in section Using GIMME_V.
EXAMPLES
Enough of the definition talk, let's have a few examples.
Perl provides many macros to assist in accessing the Perl stack. Wherever possible, these macros
should always be used when interfacing to Perl internals. We hope this should make the code less
vulnerable to any changes made to Perl in the future.
Another point worth noting is that in the first series of examples I have made use of only the
call_pv function. This has been done to keep the code simpler and ease you into the topic. Wherever
possible, if the choice is between using call_pv and call_sv, you should always try to use call_sv.
See Using call_sv for details.
No Parameters, Nothing returned
This first trivial example will call a Perl subroutine, PrintUID, to print out the UID of the
process.
sub PrintUID
{
print "UID is $<\n";
}
and here is a C function to call it
static void
call_PrintUID()
{
dSP;
PUSHMARK(SP);
call_pv("PrintUID", G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
}
Simple, eh.
A few points to note about this example.
1. Ignore "dSP" and "PUSHMARK(SP)" for now. They will be discussed in the next example.
2. We aren't passing any parameters to PrintUID so G_NOARGS can be specified.
3. We aren't interested in anything returned from PrintUID, so G_DISCARD is specified. Even if
PrintUID was changed to return some value(s), having specified G_DISCARD will mean that they
will be wiped by the time control returns from call_pv.
4. As call_pv is being used, the Perl subroutine is specified as a C string. In this case the sub-
routine name has been 'hard-wired' into the code.
5. Because we specified G_DISCARD, it is not necessary to check the value returned from call_pv. It
will always be 0.
Passing Parameters
Now let's make a slightly more complex example. This time we want to call a Perl subroutine, "Left-String", "LeftString",
String", which will take 2 parameters--a string ($s) and an integer ($n). The subroutine will simply
print the first $n characters of the string.
So the Perl subroutine would look like this
sub LeftString
{
my($s, $n) = @_;
print substr($s, 0, $n), "\n";
}
The C function required to call LeftString would look like this.
static void
call_LeftString(a, b)
char * a;
int b;
{
dSP;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(a, 0)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK;
call_pv("LeftString", G_DISCARD);
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
Here are a few notes on the C function call_LeftString.
1. Parameters are passed to the Perl subroutine using the Perl stack. This is the purpose of the
code beginning with the line "dSP" and ending with the line "PUTBACK". The "dSP" declares a
local copy of the stack pointer. This local copy should always be accessed as "SP".
2. If you are going to put something onto the Perl stack, you need to know where to put it. This is
the purpose of the macro "dSP"--it declares and initializes a local copy of the Perl stack
pointer.
All the other macros which will be used in this example require you to have used this macro.
The exception to this rule is if you are calling a Perl subroutine directly from an XSUB func-tion. function.
tion. In this case it is not necessary to use the "dSP" macro explicitly--it will be declared
for you automatically.
3. Any parameters to be pushed onto the stack should be bracketed by the "PUSHMARK" and "PUTBACK"
macros. The purpose of these two macros, in this context, is to count the number of parameters
you are pushing automatically. Then whenever Perl is creating the @_ array for the subroutine,
it knows how big to make it.
The "PUSHMARK" macro tells Perl to make a mental note of the current stack pointer. Even if you
aren't passing any parameters (like the example shown in the section No Parameters, Nothing
returned) you must still call the "PUSHMARK" macro before you can call any of the call_* func-tions--Perl functions--Perl
tions--Perl still needs to know that there are no parameters.
The "PUTBACK" macro sets the global copy of the stack pointer to be the same as our local copy.
If we didn't do this call_pv wouldn't know where the two parameters we pushed were--remember
that up to now all the stack pointer manipulation we have done is with our local copy, not the
global copy.
4. Next, we come to XPUSHs. This is where the parameters actually get pushed onto the stack. In
this case we are pushing a string and an integer.
See "XSUBs and the Argument Stack" in perlguts for details on how the XPUSH macros work.
5. Because we created temporary values (by means of sv_2mortal() calls) we will have to tidy up the
Perl stack and dispose of mortal SVs.
This is the purpose of
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
at the start of the function, and
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
at the end. The "ENTER"/"SAVETMPS" pair creates a boundary for any temporaries we create. This
means that the temporaries we get rid of will be limited to those which were created after these
calls.
The "FREETMPS"/"LEAVE" pair will get rid of any values returned by the Perl subroutine (see next
example), plus it will also dump the mortal SVs we have created. Having "ENTER"/"SAVETMPS" at
the beginning of the code makes sure that no other mortals are destroyed.
Think of these macros as working a bit like using "{" and "}" in Perl to limit the scope of
local variables.
See the section Using Perl to dispose of temporaries for details of an alternative to using
these macros.
6. Finally, LeftString can now be called via the call_pv function. The only flag specified this
time is G_DISCARD. Because we are passing 2 parameters to the Perl subroutine this time, we have
not specified G_NOARGS.
Returning a Scalar
Now for an example of dealing with the items returned from a Perl subroutine.
Here is a Perl subroutine, Adder, that takes 2 integer parameters and simply returns their sum.
sub Adder
{
my($a, $b) = @_;
$a + $b;
}
Because we are now concerned with the return value from Adder, the C function required to call it is
now a bit more complex.
static void
call_Adder(a, b)
int a;
int b;
{
dSP;
int count;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("Adder", G_SCALAR);
SPAGAIN;
if (count != 1)
croak("Big trouble\n");
printf ("The sum of %d and %d is %d\n", a, b, POPi);
PUTBACK;
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
Points to note this time are
1. The only flag specified this time was G_SCALAR. That means the @_ array will be created and that
the value returned by Adder will still exist after the call to call_pv.
2. The purpose of the macro "SPAGAIN" is to refresh the local copy of the stack pointer. This is
necessary because it is possible that the memory allocated to the Perl stack has been reallo-cated reallocated
cated whilst in the call_pv call.
If you are making use of the Perl stack pointer in your code you must always refresh the local
copy using SPAGAIN whenever you make use of the call_* functions or any other Perl internal
function.
3. Although only a single value was expected to be returned from Adder, it is still good practice
to check the return code from call_pv anyway.
Expecting a single value is not quite the same as knowing that there will be one. If someone
modified Adder to return a list and we didn't check for that possibility and take appropriate
action the Perl stack would end up in an inconsistent state. That is something you really don't
want to happen ever.
4. The "POPi" macro is used here to pop the return value from the stack. In this case we wanted an
integer, so "POPi" was used.
Here is the complete list of POP macros available, along with the types they return.
POPs SV
POPp pointer
POPn double
POPi integer
POPl long
5. The final "PUTBACK" is used to leave the Perl stack in a consistent state before exiting the
function. This is necessary because when we popped the return value from the stack with "POPi"
it updated only our local copy of the stack pointer. Remember, "PUTBACK" sets the global stack
pointer to be the same as our local copy.
Returning a list of values
Now, let's extend the previous example to return both the sum of the parameters and the difference.
Here is the Perl subroutine
sub AddSubtract
{
my($a, $b) = @_;
($a+$b, $a-$b);
}
and this is the C function
static void
call_AddSubtract(a, b)
int a;
int b;
{
dSP;
int count;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("AddSubtract", G_ARRAY);
SPAGAIN;
if (count != 2)
croak("Big trouble\n");
printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi);
printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi);
PUTBACK;
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
If call_AddSubtract is called like this
call_AddSubtract(7, 4);
then here is the output
7 - 4 = 3
7 + 4 = 11
Notes
1. We wanted list context, so G_ARRAY was used.
2. Not surprisingly "POPi" is used twice this time because we were retrieving 2 values from the
stack. The important thing to note is that when using the "POP*" macros they come off the stack
in reverse order.
Returning a list in a scalar context
Say the Perl subroutine in the previous section was called in a scalar context, like this
static void
call_AddSubScalar(a, b)
int a;
int b;
{
dSP;
int count;
int i;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("AddSubtract", G_SCALAR);
SPAGAIN;
printf ("Items Returned = %d\n", count);
for (i = 1; i <= count; ++i)
printf ("Value %d = %d\n", i, POPi);
PUTBACK;
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
The other modification made is that call_AddSubScalar will print the number of items returned from
the Perl subroutine and their value (for simplicity it assumes that they are integer). So if
call_AddSubScalar is called
call_AddSubScalar(7, 4);
then the output will be
Items Returned = 1
Value 1 = 3
In this case the main point to note is that only the last item in the list is returned from the sub-
routine, AddSubtract actually made it back to call_AddSubScalar.
Returning Data from Perl via the parameter list
It is also possible to return values directly via the parameter list - whether it is actually desir-able desirable
able to do it is another matter entirely.
The Perl subroutine, Inc, below takes 2 parameters and increments each directly.
sub Inc
{
++ $_[0];
++ $_[1];
}
and here is a C function to call it.
static void
call_Inc(a, b)
int a;
int b;
{
dSP;
int count;
SV * sva;
SV * svb;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
sva = sv_2mortal(newSViv(a));
svb = sv_2mortal(newSViv(b));
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sva);
XPUSHs(svb);
PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("Inc", G_DISCARD);
if (count != 0)
croak ("call_Inc: expected 0 values from 'Inc', got %d\n",
count);
printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", a, SvIV(sva));
printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", b, SvIV(svb));
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
To be able to access the two parameters that were pushed onto the stack after they return from
call_pv it is necessary to make a note of their addresses--thus the two variables "sva" and "svb".
The reason this is necessary is that the area of the Perl stack which held them will very likely have
been overwritten by something else by the time control returns from call_pv.
Using G_EVAL
Now an example using G_EVAL. Below is a Perl subroutine which computes the difference of its 2 param-eters. parameters.
eters. If this would result in a negative result, the subroutine calls die.
sub Subtract
{
my ($a, $b) = @_;
die "death can be fatal\n" if $a < $b;
$a - $b;
}
and some C to call it
static void
call_Subtract(a, b)
int a;
int b;
{
dSP;
int count;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("Subtract", G_EVAL|G_SCALAR);
SPAGAIN;
/* Check the eval first */
if (SvTRUE(ERRSV))
{
STRLEN n_a;
printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV(ERRSV, n_a));
POPs;
}
else
{
if (count != 1)
croak("call_Subtract: wanted 1 value from 'Subtract', got %d\n",
count);
printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi);
}
PUTBACK;
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
If call_Subtract is called thus
call_Subtract(4, 5)
the following will be printed
Uh oh - death can be fatal
Notes
1. We want to be able to catch the die so we have used the G_EVAL flag. Not specifying this flag
would mean that the program would terminate immediately at the die statement in the subroutine
Subtract.
2. The code
if (SvTRUE(ERRSV))
{
STRLEN n_a;
printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV(ERRSV, n_a));
POPs;
}
is the direct equivalent of this bit of Perl
print "Uh oh - $@\n" if $@;
"PL_errgv" is a perl global of type "GV *" that points to the symbol table entry containing the
error. "ERRSV" therefore refers to the C equivalent of $@.
3. Note that the stack is popped using "POPs" in the block where "SvTRUE(ERRSV)" is true. This is
necessary because whenever a call_* function invoked with G_EVAL|G_SCALAR returns an error, the
top of the stack holds the value undef. Because we want the program to continue after detecting
this error, it is essential that the stack is tidied up by removing the undef.
Using G_KEEPERR
Consider this rather facetious example, where we have used an XS version of the call_Subtract example
above inside a destructor:
package Foo;
sub new { bless {}, $_[0] }
sub Subtract {
my($a,$b) = @_;
die "death can be fatal" if $a < $b;
$a - $b;
}
sub DESTROY { call_Subtract(5, 4); }
sub foo { die "foo dies"; }
package main;
eval { Foo->new->foo };
print "Saw: $@" if $@; # should be, but isn't
This example will fail to recognize that an error occurred inside the "eval {}". Here's why: the
call_Subtract code got executed while perl was cleaning up temporaries when exiting the eval block,
and because call_Subtract is implemented with call_pv using the G_EVAL flag, it promptly reset $@.
This results in the failure of the outermost test for $@, and thereby the failure of the error trap.
Appending the G_KEEPERR flag, so that the call_pv call in call_Subtract reads:
count = call_pv("Subtract", G_EVAL|G_SCALAR|G_KEEPERR);
will preserve the error and restore reliable error handling.
Using call_sv
In all the previous examples I have 'hard-wired' the name of the Perl subroutine to be called from C.
Most of the time though, it is more convenient to be able to specify the name of the Perl subroutine
from within the Perl script.
Consider the Perl code below
sub fred
{
print "Hello there\n";
}
CallSubPV("fred");
Here is a snippet of XSUB which defines CallSubPV.
void
CallSubPV(name)
char * name
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
call_pv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
That is fine as far as it goes. The thing is, the Perl subroutine can be specified as only a string.
For Perl 4 this was adequate, but Perl 5 allows references to subroutines and anonymous subroutines.
This is where call_sv is useful.
The code below for CallSubSV is identical to CallSubPV except that the "name" parameter is now
defined as an SV* and we use call_sv instead of call_pv.
void
CallSubSV(name)
SV * name
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
call_sv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
Because we are using an SV to call fred the following can all be used
CallSubSV("fred");
CallSubSV(\&fred);
$ref = \&fred;
CallSubSV($ref);
CallSubSV( sub { print "Hello there\n" } );
As you can see, call_sv gives you much greater flexibility in how you can specify the Perl subrou-tine. subroutine.
tine.
You should note that if it is necessary to store the SV ("name" in the example above) which corre-sponds corresponds
sponds to the Perl subroutine so that it can be used later in the program, it not enough just to
store a copy of the pointer to the SV. Say the code above had been like this
static SV * rememberSub;
void
SaveSub1(name)
SV * name
CODE:
rememberSub = name;
void
CallSavedSub1()
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
call_sv(rememberSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
The reason this is wrong is that by the time you come to use the pointer "rememberSub" in "CallSaved-Sub1", "CallSavedSub1",
Sub1", it may or may not still refer to the Perl subroutine that was recorded in "SaveSub1". This is
particularly true for these cases
SaveSub1(\&fred);
CallSavedSub1();
SaveSub1( sub { print "Hello there\n" } );
CallSavedSub1();
By the time each of the "SaveSub1" statements above have been executed, the SV*s which corresponded
to the parameters will no longer exist. Expect an error message from Perl of the form
Can't use an undefined value as a subroutine reference at ...
for each of the "CallSavedSub1" lines.
Similarly, with this code
$ref = \&fred;
SaveSub1($ref);
$ref = 47;
CallSavedSub1();
you can expect one of these messages (which you actually get is dependent on the version of Perl you
are using)
Not a CODE reference at ...
Undefined subroutine &main::47 called ...
The variable $ref may have referred to the subroutine "fred" whenever the call to "SaveSub1" was made
but by the time "CallSavedSub1" gets called it now holds the number 47. Because we saved only a
pointer to the original SV in "SaveSub1", any changes to $ref will be tracked by the pointer "remem-berSub". "rememberSub".
berSub". This means that whenever "CallSavedSub1" gets called, it will attempt to execute the code
which is referenced by the SV* "rememberSub". In this case though, it now refers to the integer 47,
so expect Perl to complain loudly.
A similar but more subtle problem is illustrated with this code
$ref = \&fred;
SaveSub1($ref);
$ref = \&joe;
CallSavedSub1();
This time whenever "CallSavedSub1" get called it will execute the Perl subroutine "joe" (assuming it
exists) rather than "fred" as was originally requested in the call to "SaveSub1".
To get around these problems it is necessary to take a full copy of the SV. The code below shows
"SaveSub2" modified to do that
static SV * keepSub = (SV*)NULL;
void
SaveSub2(name)
SV * name
CODE:
/* Take a copy of the callback */
if (keepSub == (SV*)NULL)
/* First time, so create a new SV */
keepSub = newSVsv(name);
else
/* Been here before, so overwrite */
SvSetSV(keepSub, name);
void
CallSavedSub2()
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
call_sv(keepSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
To avoid creating a new SV every time "SaveSub2" is called, the function first checks to see if it
has been called before. If not, then space for a new SV is allocated and the reference to the Perl
subroutine, "name" is copied to the variable "keepSub" in one operation using "newSVsv". Thereafter,
whenever "SaveSub2" is called the existing SV, "keepSub", is overwritten with the new value using
"SvSetSV".
Using call_argv
Here is a Perl subroutine which prints whatever parameters are passed to it.
sub PrintList
{
my(@list) = @_;
foreach (@list) { print "$_\n" }
}
and here is an example of call_argv which will call PrintList.
static char * words[] = {"alpha", "beta", "gamma", "delta", NULL};
static void
call_PrintList()
{
dSP;
call_argv("PrintList", G_DISCARD, words);
}
Note that it is not necessary to call "PUSHMARK" in this instance. This is because call_argv will do
it for you.
Using call_method
Consider the following Perl code
{
package Mine;
sub new
{
my($type) = shift;
bless [@_]
}
sub Display
{
my ($self, $index) = @_;
print "$index: $$self[$index]\n";
}
sub PrintID
{
my($class) = @_;
print "This is Class $class version 1.0\n";
}
}
It implements just a very simple class to manage an array. Apart from the constructor, "new", it
declares methods, one static and one virtual. The static method, "PrintID", prints out simply the
class name and a version number. The virtual method, "Display", prints out a single element of the
array. Here is an all Perl example of using it.
$a = new Mine ('red', 'green', 'blue');
$a->Display(1);
PrintID Mine;
will print
1: green
This is Class Mine version 1.0
Calling a Perl method from C is fairly straightforward. The following things are required
a reference to the object for a virtual method or the name of the class for a static method.
the name of the method.
any other parameters specific to the method.
Here is a simple XSUB which illustrates the mechanics of calling both the "PrintID" and "Display"
methods from C.
void
call_Method(ref, method, index)
SV * ref
char * method
int index
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(ref);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(index)));
PUTBACK;
call_method(method, G_DISCARD);
void
call_PrintID(class, method)
char * class
char * method
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(class, 0)));
PUTBACK;
call_method(method, G_DISCARD);
So the methods "PrintID" and "Display" can be invoked like this
$a = new Mine ('red', 'green', 'blue');
call_Method($a, 'Display', 1);
call_PrintID('Mine', 'PrintID');
The only thing to note is that in both the static and virtual methods, the method name is not passed
via the stack--it is used as the first parameter to call_method.
Using GIMME_V
Here is a trivial XSUB which prints the context in which it is currently executing.
void
PrintContext()
CODE:
I32 gimme = GIMME_V;
if (gimme == G_VOID)
printf ("Context is Void\n");
else if (gimme == G_SCALAR)
printf ("Context is Scalar\n");
else
printf ("Context is Array\n");
and here is some Perl to test it
PrintContext;
$a = PrintContext;
@a = PrintContext;
The output from that will be
Context is Void
Context is Scalar
Context is Array
Using Perl to dispose of temporaries
In the examples given to date, any temporaries created in the callback (i.e., parameters passed on
the stack to the call_* function or values returned via the stack) have been freed by one of these
methods
specifying the G_DISCARD flag with call_*.
explicitly disposed of using the "ENTER"/"SAVETMPS" - "FREETMPS"/"LEAVE" pairing.
There is another method which can be used, namely letting Perl do it for you automatically whenever
it regains control after the callback has terminated. This is done by simply not using the
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
...
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
sequence in the callback (and not, of course, specifying the G_DISCARD flag).
If you are going to use this method you have to be aware of a possible memory leak which can arise
under very specific circumstances. To explain these circumstances you need to know a bit about the
flow of control between Perl and the callback routine.
The examples given at the start of the document (an error handler and an event driven program) are
typical of the two main sorts of flow control that you are likely to encounter with callbacks. There
is a very important distinction between them, so pay attention.
In the first example, an error handler, the flow of control could be as follows. You have created an
interface to an external library. Control can reach the external library like this
perl --> XSUB --> external library
Whilst control is in the library, an error condition occurs. You have previously set up a Perl call-back callback
back to handle this situation, so it will get executed. Once the callback has finished, control will
drop back to Perl again. Here is what the flow of control will be like in that situation
perl --> XSUB --> external library
...
error occurs
...
external library --> call_* --> perl
|
perl <-- XSUB <-- external library <-- call_* <----+
After processing of the error using call_* is completed, control reverts back to Perl more or less
immediately.
In the diagram, the further right you go the more deeply nested the scope is. It is only when con-
trol is back with perl on the extreme left of the diagram that you will have dropped back to the
enclosing scope and any temporaries you have left hanging around will be freed.
In the second example, an event driven program, the flow of control will be more like this
perl --> XSUB --> event handler
...
event handler --> call_* --> perl
|
event handler <-- call_* <----+
...
event handler --> call_* --> perl
|
event handler <-- call_* <----+
...
event handler --> call_* --> perl
|
event handler <-- call_* <----+
In this case the flow of control can consist of only the repeated sequence
event handler --> call_* --> perl
for practically the complete duration of the program. This means that control may never drop back to
the surrounding scope in Perl at the extreme left.
So what is the big problem? Well, if you are expecting Perl to tidy up those temporaries for you, you
might be in for a long wait. For Perl to dispose of your temporaries, control must drop back to the
enclosing scope at some stage. In the event driven scenario that may never happen. This means that
as time goes on, your program will create more and more temporaries, none of which will ever be
freed. As each of these temporaries consumes some memory your program will eventually consume all the
available memory in your system--kapow!
So here is the bottom line--if you are sure that control will revert back to the enclosing Perl scope
fairly quickly after the end of your callback, then it isn't absolutely necessary to dispose explic-itly explicitly
itly of any temporaries you may have created. Mind you, if you are at all uncertain about what to do,
it doesn't do any harm to tidy up anyway.
Strategies for storing Callback Context Information
Potentially one of the trickiest problems to overcome when designing a callback interface can be fig-uring figuring
uring out how to store the mapping between the C callback function and the Perl equivalent.
To help understand why this can be a real problem first consider how a callback is set up in an all C
environment. Typically a C API will provide a function to register a callback. This will expect a
pointer to a function as one of its parameters. Below is a call to a hypothetical function "regis-ter_fatal" "register_fatal"
ter_fatal" which registers the C function to get called when a fatal error occurs.
register_fatal(cb1);
The single parameter "cb1" is a pointer to a function, so you must have defined "cb1" in your code,
say something like this
static void
cb1()
{
printf ("Fatal Error\n");
exit(1);
}
Now change that to call a Perl subroutine instead
static SV * callback = (SV*)NULL;
static void
cb1()
{
dSP;
PUSHMARK(SP);
/* Call the Perl sub to process the callback */
call_sv(callback, G_DISCARD);
}
void
register_fatal(fn)
SV * fn
CODE:
/* Remember the Perl sub */
if (callback == (SV*)NULL)
callback = newSVsv(fn);
else
SvSetSV(callback, fn);
/* register the callback with the external library */
register_fatal(cb1);
where the Perl equivalent of "register_fatal" and the callback it registers, "pcb1", might look like
this
# Register the sub pcb1
register_fatal(\&pcb1);
sub pcb1
{
die "I'm dying...\n";
}
The mapping between the C callback and the Perl equivalent is stored in the global variable "call-back". "callback".
back".
This will be adequate if you ever need to have only one callback registered at any time. An example
could be an error handler like the code sketched out above. Remember though, repeated calls to "reg-ister_fatal" "register_fatal"
ister_fatal" will replace the previously registered callback function with the new one.
Say for example you want to interface to a library which allows asynchronous file i/o. In this case
you may be able to register a callback whenever a read operation has completed. To be of any use we
want to be able to call separate Perl subroutines for each file that is opened. As it stands, the
error handler example above would not be adequate as it allows only a single callback to be defined
at any time. What we require is a means of storing the mapping between the opened file and the Perl
subroutine we want to be called for that file.
Say the i/o library has a function "asynch_read" which associates a C function "ProcessRead" with a
file handle "fh"--this assumes that it has also provided some routine to open the file and so obtain
the file handle.
asynch_read(fh, ProcessRead)
This may expect the C ProcessRead function of this form
void
ProcessRead(fh, buffer)
int fh;
char * buffer;
{
...
}
To provide a Perl interface to this library we need to be able to map between the "fh" parameter and
the Perl subroutine we want called. A hash is a convenient mechanism for storing this mapping. The
code below shows a possible implementation
static HV * Mapping = (HV*)NULL;
void
asynch_read(fh, callback)
int fh
SV * callback
CODE:
/* If the hash doesn't already exist, create it */
if (Mapping == (HV*)NULL)
Mapping = newHV();
/* Save the fh -> callback mapping */
hv_store(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), newSVsv(callback), 0);
/* Register with the C Library */
asynch_read(fh, asynch_read_if);
and "asynch_read_if" could look like this
static void
asynch_read_if(fh, buffer)
int fh;
char * buffer;
{
dSP;
SV ** sv;
/* Get the callback associated with fh */
sv = hv_fetch(Mapping, (char*)&fh , sizeof(fh), FALSE);
if (sv == (SV**)NULL)
croak("Internal error...\n");
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(fh)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0)));
PUTBACK;
/* Call the Perl sub */
call_sv(*sv, G_DISCARD);
}
For completeness, here is "asynch_close". This shows how to remove the entry from the hash "Map-ping". "Mapping".
ping".
void
asynch_close(fh)
int fh
CODE:
/* Remove the entry from the hash */
(void) hv_delete(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), G_DISCARD);
/* Now call the real asynch_close */
asynch_close(fh);
So the Perl interface would look like this
sub callback1
{
my($handle, $buffer) = @_;
}
# Register the Perl callback
asynch_read($fh, \&callback1);
asynch_close($fh);
The mapping between the C callback and Perl is stored in the global hash "Mapping" this time. Using a
hash has the distinct advantage that it allows an unlimited number of callbacks to be registered.
What if the interface provided by the C callback doesn't contain a parameter which allows the file
handle to Perl subroutine mapping? Say in the asynchronous i/o package, the callback function gets
passed only the "buffer" parameter like this
void
ProcessRead(buffer)
char * buffer;
{
...
}
Without the file handle there is no straightforward way to map from the C callback to the Perl sub-routine. subroutine.
routine.
In this case a possible way around this problem is to predefine a series of C functions to act as the
interface to Perl, thus
#define MAX_CB 3
#define NULL_HANDLE -1
typedef void (*FnMap)();
struct MapStruct {
FnMap Function;
SV * PerlSub;
int Handle;
};
static void fn1();
static void fn2();
static void fn3();
static struct MapStruct Map [MAX_CB] =
{
{ fn1, NULL, NULL_HANDLE },
{ fn2, NULL, NULL_HANDLE },
{ fn3, NULL, NULL_HANDLE }
};
static void
Pcb(index, buffer)
int index;
char * buffer;
{
dSP;
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0)));
PUTBACK;
/* Call the Perl sub */
call_sv(Map[index].PerlSub, G_DISCARD);
}
static void
fn1(buffer)
char * buffer;
{
Pcb(0, buffer);
}
static void
fn2(buffer)
char * buffer;
{
Pcb(1, buffer);
}
static void
fn3(buffer)
char * buffer;
{
Pcb(2, buffer);
}
void
array_asynch_read(fh, callback)
int fh
SV * callback
CODE:
int index;
int null_index = MAX_CB;
/* Find the same handle or an empty entry */
for (index = 0; index < MAX_CB; ++index)
{
if (Map[index].Handle == fh)
break;
if (Map[index].Handle == NULL_HANDLE)
null_index = index;
}
if (index == MAX_CB && null_index == MAX_CB)
croak ("Too many callback functions registered\n");
if (index == MAX_CB)
index = null_index;
/* Save the file handle */
Map[index].Handle = fh;
/* Remember the Perl sub */
if (Map[index].PerlSub == (SV*)NULL)
Map[index].PerlSub = newSVsv(callback);
else
SvSetSV(Map[index].PerlSub, callback);
asynch_read(fh, Map[index].Function);
void
array_asynch_close(fh)
int fh
CODE:
int index;
/* Find the file handle */
for (index = 0; index < MAX_CB; ++ index)
if (Map[index].Handle == fh)
break;
if (index == MAX_CB)
croak ("could not close fh %d\n", fh);
Map[index].Handle = NULL_HANDLE;
SvREFCNT_dec(Map[index].PerlSub);
Map[index].PerlSub = (SV*)NULL;
asynch_close(fh);
In this case the functions "fn1", "fn2", and "fn3" are used to remember the Perl subroutine to be
called. Each of the functions holds a separate hard-wired index which is used in the function "Pcb"
to access the "Map" array and actually call the Perl subroutine.
There are some obvious disadvantages with this technique.
Firstly, the code is considerably more complex than with the previous example.
Secondly, there is a hard-wired limit (in this case 3) to the number of callbacks that can exist
simultaneously. The only way to increase the limit is by modifying the code to add more functions and
then recompiling. None the less, as long as the number of functions is chosen with some care, it is
still a workable solution and in some cases is the only one available.
To summarize, here are a number of possible methods for you to consider for storing the mapping
between C and the Perl callback
1. Ignore the problem - Allow only 1 callback
For a lot of situations, like interfacing to an error handler, this may be a perfectly adequate
solution.
2. Create a sequence of callbacks - hard wired limit
If it is impossible to tell from the parameters passed back from the C callback what the context
is, then you may need to create a sequence of C callback interface functions, and store pointers
to each in an array.
3. Use a parameter to map to the Perl callback
A hash is an ideal mechanism to store the mapping between C and Perl.
Alternate Stack Manipulation
Although I have made use of only the "POP*" macros to access values returned from Perl subroutines,
it is also possible to bypass these macros and read the stack using the "ST" macro (See perlxs for a
full description of the "ST" macro).
Most of the time the "POP*" macros should be adequate, the main problem with them is that they force
you to process the returned values in sequence. This may not be the most suitable way to process the
values in some cases. What we want is to be able to access the stack in a random order. The "ST"
macro as used when coding an XSUB is ideal for this purpose.
The code below is the example given in the section Returning a list of values recoded to use "ST"
instead of "POP*".
static void
call_AddSubtract2(a, b)
int a;
int b;
{
dSP;
I32 ax;
int count;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("AddSubtract", G_ARRAY);
SPAGAIN;
SP -= count;
ax = (SP - PL_stack_base) + 1;
if (count != 2)
croak("Big trouble\n");
printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(0)));
printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(1)));
PUTBACK;
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
Notes
1. Notice that it was necessary to define the variable "ax". This is because the "ST" macro
expects it to exist. If we were in an XSUB it would not be necessary to define "ax" as it is
already defined for you.
2. The code
SPAGAIN;
SP -= count;
ax = (SP - PL_stack_base) + 1;
sets the stack up so that we can use the "ST" macro.
3. Unlike the original coding of this example, the returned values are not accessed in reverse
order. So ST(0) refers to the first value returned by the Perl subroutine and "ST(count-1)"
refers to the last.
Creating and calling an anonymous subroutine in C
As we've already shown, "call_sv" can be used to invoke an anonymous subroutine. However, our exam-
ple showed a Perl script invoking an XSUB to perform this operation. Let's see how it can be done
inside our C code:
...
SV *cvrv = eval_pv("sub { print 'You will not find me cluttering any namespace!' }", TRUE);
...
call_sv(cvrv, G_VOID|G_NOARGS);
"eval_pv" is used to compile the anonymous subroutine, which will be the return value as well (read
more about "eval_pv" in "eval_pv" in perlapi). Once this code reference is in hand, it can be mixed
in with all the previous examples we've shown.
SEE ALSO
perlxs, perlguts, perlembed
AUTHOR
Paul Marquess
Special thanks to the following people who assisted in the creation of the document.
Jeff Okamoto, Tim Bunce, Nick Gianniotis, Steve Kelem, Gurusamy Sarathy and Larry Wall.
DATE
Version 1.3, 14th Apr 1997
perl v5.8.8 2006-01-07 PERLCALL(1)
|